– A human configuration system –

PDF V1.0


The system. (v1.0)



**This is presently on ‘Pause’ so that the information can expand to allow for further participation of those with the relevant ‘freq’ to best participate in proposed system**


Version 1.1

Updating Changes

  • UXL Universal Exchange ledger
  • Fixing edits – removing redundant info.
  • Fixing language.
  • Fixing formatting.
  • Updating images








A –  The Network


B – Open source Open code Hardware and Software.


C – The network infrastructure – C

C1 – Powering and energy

C2 -Conceptual first network adapter

C3 – Intermediate Node Infrastructure

C4 – Network integration on a colony wide scale


D – The System Protocols – D

D1 – ‘Money’ application ‘Money’ issuance, core credit issuance protocol.

D2 – The ‘Market’ and distribution of ‘Credit’

D3 – Overview of market mechanism – break down in images.


E – Attractive System implementation ‘Attractors’

E1 – Core devices and objectives (Attractors) Free Self powered Network.

E2 –  ideal of self sufficiency ‘capitalism’ > Core principals.

E3 – Essential Energy and power systems.

E4  – DIY (Do it yourself ) Sustainable  Modular economy.


F- Identification of a citizen, Citizen Key  (the Mark ID)

F1 – Encoded Identification system that can’t be easily duplicated.


G – A leaderless system that balances corruption / creativity.


H – Definitions of community? What constitutes a community?

H1 – ‘Voting’ in a community with a ‘Citizen Key’

I – ‘Inflation’ and new citizen socioeconomic incentives.

I1 – How do human perceive ‘inflation’ ?


J – Explaining decentralized robotics and algorithms – disconnected relational systems. 

J1 – Joanna’s Wholesales.

J2- Decentralized algorithms ‘robots’ in the process.

J3 – Important points on decentralized V centralized efficiency, how decentralized systems solve corruption for the most efficient result though incentive to the many.



Please Note: within is a document for a system of concepts, all these concepts are achievable, even if you don’t presently have the personal ability to immediately carry them out, that decision is ultimately up to you as an individual, and humans as a group.

Seek real education and try to network.

it is your actions that matter.


I have studied ‘humans’ for a while as I presently occupy a human type DNA container.

I have a new possible configuration system to help the possible/probable integration of the humans of this colony into the larger set in the immediate sector of this galaxy.

I have already passed the basics of this system to various members of various groups in this sector of the galaxy.

The objectives and purpose of this document are (3) primarily -:

  1. To try to use images where there might have be any language barrier for any various groups.
  2. Also to help clarification of the micro-economic aspects of ‘Money’ (which not all groups use, or in this way)
  3. In a hope to introduce it to humans and post it here in an open source manner with as much basic detail as possible for anyone to consider.

This config system is designed for anyone that finds it useful in part or whole, including in any colony not limited to ‘Earth’

If there are possible benefit in this system that lay outside the obvious possible trade and integration benefits of multiple race class co-habitation  feel free to take or borrow any aspect of this system it’s just my ‘gift’ to everyone, and a way to partly occupy my time here.


System benefits for the Humanoid type DNA container. (a brief analysis) 

The human type DNA container has a large aspect of primate DNA and thus has specific psychological and stimulative requirements, ‘money’ is definitively one aspect of that.

humans type DNA seems to have the ability to achieve a large variance of freq from it’s upper to lower bounds.

It is taking into account these variances as studied that I have designed this basic system of configuration based on ‘freedom’ and with ‘money’

it also appeals to the various psychological aspects of the human type DNA container, but is defined by the participants.

The system ideal is an ‘energy neutral’ system, which is also essentially ‘leaderless’ from the energy point of view, if we are defining a ‘leader’ as an entity, group or corporation that can extract energy from others.

The system is specifically designed to equalize that possibility, and uses the participants to do this.


A – The Network.

Essential to the core of the system is a ‘decentralized’ network.

Also known as a ‘mesh’ network, this type of network is a system that interconnects various individual devices into a type of ‘mesh’.

Humans could have built mesh networks already but have not had the  ‘political’ will to do so or the ‘capital’ ability with the present system being a corporate central focused system.

to understand a little bit about what a ‘mesh’ network is see here for an introduction:

How Wireless Mesh Networks Work


although the network should not be limited only to transmit on these specific ‘radio’ spectrum.

The network should be able to transmit the same data over a broad spectrum of ‘frequency’ but at the inception of it’s evolution it could be narrow.

The basis for a Mesh network ‘protocol’ now exist in the form of the IPFS system which stands for “Inter Planetary File system”

to learn more about the Inter Planetary File system IPFS follow this link:

Inter Planetary Files System


Primary device to interface the network

Imaged below is a personal mobile device:


This device type  allows humans to interface many vectors of information simultaneously:

  • Audio
  • Video
  • Network data
  • Written data
  • And many other sense attributes.

it is an effective tool for all spectrum of information.

The mesh network should be available in an uninterrupted manner  to these devices but also simultaneously be a ‘node’ to add to the infrastructure of the network.

The mesh network can interface with all other existing networks and become a part of them, specific aspects of citizen access would be based on ‘encryption’ parameters (see later explanations)

So to make that clear everything should/will be view-able on but some aspects of the designed code will only be participated by different individuals.

the ‘mesh’ network is free and open just as the Internet ideals now.

No central source can delete or control the data flow inside the mesh network simply based on the core principal of the design, so any individual using the network is free to be as ‘private’ or ‘open’ as they are now, natural information dynamics will equalize the flow and content if the system is functioning correctly.



B – Open source Open code Hardware and Software.

Network parameters have to be open source, the hardware will necessarily be open source due to the nature of the distribution.

The protocols of the mesh system will need to be open source, any breach in this directive could be seen as a compromise of the system.

The hardware interface for the infrastructure  will be open source with certain possible encryption protocols.

individualized nodes for Mobile devices (or mobile devices) will be open source hardware.

‘Core’ ‘Hotspot’ nodes will be hardware open sourced and open distributed.

The market code and ‘credit’ infrastructure has to be 100% open source

Any deviation from this would be considered a critical flaw and would need to be addressed or terminated (will cover this later) the ‘natural’ market should do this in an information ‘reality’ fork where ‘centralized info’ is routed around.


C – The network infrastructure


C1 – Powering and Energy.

‘Powering’ devices is the key to the network infrastructure and key to robustness of a any network infrastructure.

Fortunately humans will soon have the ability to use free unlimited energy in an appropriate and useful way.

The technology has existed for many ‘years’ however this is up to the citizens of this colony to decide to study and take the initiative to try to understand the concepts.

The first such concepts i propose as and ‘idea’ are a type of low power ‘infinite’ battery for portable devices.

This ‘self made’ technology is easily within the grasp of human capability.

here is an ‘idea’ (picture) example of a small solid state ‘self powering’ ‘battery’ for mobile device ‘mesh adapters’



these would be a key to and easily integrated mesh network ‘adapter’ to be explained.

C1.1 – Power alternatives to gravity (‘magnetic’) systems.

The principal of ‘gravity’ and energy may make some people uncomfortable for ‘Class 0~’ colonies.

So a very viable alternative to power the network would be to simply raise the efficiency of ‘solar adapters’ then combine that with an acceptable capacitance and storage system.

this could be both localized and centrally distributed.

Lets explain with examples and images:

The localized solar charger :

By simply lifting the efficiency of the solar absorbency system to 90+% from it’s current 3~ to 10~ % (when accounting for ‘charge controlling and capacitance inefficiency’)

Most (if not all) of the localized device powering can be achieved.


[A] – An efficient crystal solar adapter.

this energy would then be routed to what humans now call a ‘battery’ which will really be an efficient capacitor which should provide for most of the localized energy requirements.

the same principal can be easily ‘scaled up’ stored and distributed by various means.


C2 – Conceptual first network adapter:

This in principal simple device will be a ‘dual prime application device’

The Primary functions of this device will be:

  • To provide uninterrupted power to the mobile device.
  • To provide uninterrupted power to the mesh adapter link.
  • To provide uninterrupted access to the mesh network.
  • To have a ‘universal’ connector that can interchange for any common mobile device.

Here is a general image and a break down of the basic design:


Mesh Adapter.

image labels Mesh adapter :

[A] – This section of the adapter provides universal power for the mobile device and the mesh adapter.

[B] – This section of the adapter provides the dynamic connection to the mesh network (or any nearby major node for the mesh network) it is powered by the [A] section of the adapter.

[C] – This section has on one side a common mobile device connector to interface with the mobile device, and this ‘interface adapter’ connects to the mesh adapter with a proprietary connection on the other side so it can be removed and replaced this allows for adaption to any common mobile device.

[D] – Mobile device of common type.

[E] – The adapter interface for any common mobile device, (Power + Data) this section is interchangeable (see later image)

[F] – Common mobile interface which powers and provides data for the mobile device.

Network mesh adapter interchange section for common mobile devices:


 Label interchangeable mobile interfaces:

[A] – The proprietary connection to the adapter.

[B] – An interchangeable adapter to interface to a standard mobile device.

[C] – An alternative adapter to interface to a standard mobile device.

Open Source Mobile Integration of mesh adapter


You may have heard of an open source ‘Block’ phone:

Phonebloks is the modular phone you custom build with blocks


such a mobile variant would be perfect of course for a self powered mesh adapter, or a self powered driver unit and a mesh adapter unit.

I would expect this evolution to occur reasonably quickly, post an equalization of any variant colony of 0~ ‘level’


C3 – Intermediate Node Infrastructure.

The mobile network adapter is good for a localized robust mesh network however to spread that network and to add to infrastructure there would be a need for intermediate nodes similar to a ‘hot spot’ if you like.

These ‘On ramps’ should be portable and also self powered devices.

The main purpose of these devices is to both boost the mesh and provide ample connection capacity.

Again, the energy technology to self powered this allows for mobility and interruption free operation these devices have been existing for a significant time (on this colony) and could be quite variable, the only thing generally lacking is the initiative and will for education presently by the citizens.

Here is a general conceptual design:


 Intermediate Node label

[A] – Sender and receiver node  which aligns vertically or horizontally.

[B] – Common back brace for attachment to wall, desk or roofs.

[C] – Config ports and power on/off section.


C4 – Network integration on a colony wide scale.

If / When at a point of community / communities some may work together to expand the infrastructure colony wide as the network is open source any community would have access to this common infrastructure.

This could be done by generally converting intermediate nodes into small ‘swarm’ self powered satellites, using (now to human reality) common anti-grav propulsion technology.

you may have heard of the ‘EM Drive’ :


EM Drive is reportedly still producing thrust after another round of NASA testing



This configuration is a great test / start but it is ‘broken’ technology based on a common microwave oven parts.

As humans discover the very basic principals behind these devices they will easily overcome the issues to build a self powered ‘AG’ intermediate node satellite swarm.

The only larger infrastructure requirements would be a launcher to overcome the relatively strong Earth gravity however even that can be made portable and with the ability to launch without propellant.

here is a basic conceptual image of a small ‘AG’ mesh node Satellite:


But lets not get ahead of ourselves, this config system is decentralized it’s existence does not require satellites in any way shape or form.


Summary of Network IMPORTANT NOTE:

Before continuing I have to state that:

This network comprises about 80% of the ‘system’. (in my opinion)

What follows is the best example of an energy neutral ‘money’ or ‘Credit’ system HOWEVER if humans as a race and society can only achieve this above generally described ‘self powered mesh network’ the equalizing effects of information flow will likely necessarily lead to a type of energy neutral system regardless.

So the important thing to understand is that the free self powered mesh network is the primary aspect (80%~) of this system, everything that follows is my best example of a type of energy neutral self ‘management’ ‘Credit’ system.



 D – The System Protocols

All mentions of the words ‘Credits’ can and will be termed ‘Money Token(s)’ it is the same thing.

A ‘money token’ is an ‘energy token’ it is a token for ‘human’ energy’

the application of the system that runs on the mesh network is a community based decentralized ‘Credit’ or ‘Money’ type system.

however the system is energy neutral (in it’s ideal) that is to say:

there is no advantage by any issuer as i will explain.

In all human ‘money’ type systems previous to this system there has always been an energy advantage by some party or entity, that advantage primarily historically has been with the issuance of the ‘money’

money is really just an ‘Energy token’ it is a token that is used in place of human energy.(in a human system)

So the objective of the system is:

  • To remove any feasible advantage in issuance from any individual in the system.
  • Pass that ‘issuance and recycle redistribution’ responsibility to the code which is overseen by all the participants (in an open source way).
  • Then, recycle the ‘money’ (energy) back to the citizens using that ‘money’ in an energy neutral way. (I intend to clarify as you read)

These are the core objectives of the protocols of the code in the system.


D1 – ‘Money’ application ‘Money’ issuance, core credit issuance protocol.

Each citizen will run an application  which exists on the mesh network in a decentralize way but is intimately linked to them.

This application (code) will instantly ‘Credit’ each new verified citizen with a (X) amount of ‘Money” Credits.

these ‘Credits’ are not a ‘loan’ as they have no energy attached, and thus breech no fundamental economic or relational laws.

the only time the ‘Credits’ have ‘value’ is if they are used by the citizen when they attach energy to them, and as that energy is their own they can never be a ‘loan’ at issuance.

So upon citizenship the application code will issue to Citizen [Y] an amount of ‘Credits’ [X] from the system. the system ledger just adds them into existence and they are intimately link (initially) with ‘encryption’ to that citizen.

This is not ‘Free’ money because it has no energy attached to it. (in theory as we are assuming these are the first citizens and it is not being used by the citizens yet)

I don’t mind educating ‘economists’ on this principal if they have difficulty understanding it, you can direct them to my contact and i will answer any questions.



‘Welcome to [Y] community your [X] credits have been issued. click your ‘Account’ page for more info. have fun !’


So in the most basic and simple form every ‘citizen’ of each community will be issued ‘Credit’ on application and approval of integration to A / the community.

The number [X] of issued credits is wholly unimportant however it will determine the prices symbols of the ‘goods and services’ of the citizens.

i.e :

if the issuance [X] is a large ‘symbol number’ then the ‘price’ symbols will have large symbol numbers.

If the issuance [X] is a small ‘symbol number’ then the ‘price’ symbols will be a division of the original [X] symbol.


So if Joe becomes a citizen of the [Y] community and is issued 1000 million ‘[Y] Credits’ and so is every other [Y] citizen (as is determined by the protocol) then the prices will be multiples of ‘millions’ in symbol form.

  • Each Citizen is issued an number [X] of citizen credits.
  • Each Citizen is issued the exact number as every other as determined by the Open Source code upon citizenship application of any community.
  • if the issuance [X] number varies one could consider the community ‘non viable’ but that is wholly up to the participants of any community to decide. (as will be explained)


D2 – The ‘Market’ and distribution of ‘Credit’

The ‘Market’ is more than just a place to sell or buy it is an integrated aspect of the open source core code.

In this system what i am calling a ‘Market’ is really an integrated redistribution system of the credit.

how does the market work?

Any citizen of any community can buy or sell any item or service at any price.

Any citizen can set up a ‘store’ or ‘bazaar’ or can sell on an agreed community store.

These stores can be ‘online’ or on the street or wherever the community sees acceptable. (with the relevant interfaces)

However a set ‘fee’ [Z]  will be applied to every transaction, this will be a part of the market and system open source code.

These ‘fees’ [Z] will be accumulated and wholly 100% redistributed back (by division) to every current citizen of that community.

  • This redistribution will occur on a certain time stamp (i.e instant, Hour, Day, week or month)
  • Distribution Time stamp will be determined by each community, and the open source code.
  • All accumulated ‘fees’ [Z] will be divided by the current number of valid citizens and issued instantly to each citizens account.
  • So at that time each citizen will receive a division credit of the number # of the accumulated fees [Z]
  • This and all numbers will be able to be checked on the open source code by any citizen of any community. (as will be explained clearer )

The ‘fee’ will be set by the community (and determined by the code) and thus will also determine the redistribution % of ‘credits’ to the citizens of that community.

Basic example:

A high mandatory ‘fee’ % would result in a lot more distribution % but may also hinder  consumption of ‘goods and services’ and velocity of credit.

A very low ‘fee’ % would be a ‘laissez faire’ type system however may hinder innovation  as there is less redistribution and the system would be driven more towards consumption.

both of these vectors would necessarily effect ‘money’ velocity so would also effect ‘prices’ in a neutral market, however as the system is energy neutral it would be necessarily self rectifying.

In my opinion it takes a lot of work an energy to have a system as ‘dysfunctional’ as the present centralized human cofig system, it is a well designed and finally tuned exaction system that should be praised in many and all aspect of it’s design, it is much more difficult in my opinion to design such a system of extraction than an energy neutral system.

People can gift others credit and even ‘loan’ if they wish although no debt on issuance will exist in the open source code.

‘loaning’ may not have a large need or aspect in such a ‘energy neutral’ credit system.

To be clear in this example the ‘Fee’ is attached to the transactions.


D3 – Overview of market mechanism – break down in images.

(all numbers and %’s are arbitrary and for example only)


Point 1

Example transaction:



Meet Airl and  Roj

  • Airl send Roj  333 ‘Credits’
  • The mandatory ‘market fee’ is taken from the transaction in this example it is taken from the sender Airl.
  • The example ‘Market Fee’ is .5% (or half of 1%)
  • So the the fee is 1.665 Credits of the amount to be sent for the transaction.
  • Airl wants to send 333 credits (for whatever purpose) and this cost 1.665 credits to transact.
  • Roj receives the 333 Credits and the .5 is deducted from Airl account making his total deductions 334.665 for that transaction.

Above explains how a ‘Fee’ is taken from a transaction in this case the fee is taken from the person sending the transaction however that can vary i a number of ways.


Point 2

Total citizens :


for this arbitrary example there are 374 citizens.


Point 3

Example number of Transactions:


Let’s in this example say that there are 700 total transactions before the time period at which the distribution occurs the time-stamp.

and lets break them down as such:

  • 700 Transactions total

For simplicity of this example this 700 total transactions is broken down into just 3 types of transactions:

  1. 500 transactions of 133 [X] ‘Credits’
  2. 100 transactions of 333 [X] ‘Credits’
  3. 100 transaction of 440 [X] ‘Credits’

Knowing this information we can now simply work out how much is distributed back to the population of that community at the end of the time-stamp, for example that my be the end of the day or the end of the week at a certain time-stamp.


Point 4

The Transaction ‘fee’ 0.5%  or (1/2  of  1%) in this example.

Lets do the basic calculation to find the fee for each type of transaction:


So in our example (3 types of transaction) we can easily find the ‘fee’ for each because in this example there was only 3 types:

the Fee’s are as follows:

  1.  0.665 for first type.
  2. 1.665 for second type.
  3. 2.2 for the 3rd type.

there were:

  1. 500x  Transactions of type 1
  2. 100 x Transactions of type 2
  3. 100 x Transactions of type 3

so the grand total of ‘fees’ taken before the time-stamp is

(500 x 0.665= 332.5) + (100 x 1.665= 166.5) + (100 x 2.2 = 220)

doing the calculation to simplify:

(332.5) + (166.5) + (220) = 719

So the total number of ‘fee’s’ in ‘Credits’ collected before the time-stamp is :

719 ‘Credits’


Point 5



So when we simply divide 719 ‘Credits’ amount 374 citizens each citizen receives :


(719 / 374) = 1.922 ‘Credits’ back into their ‘account’ when the time-stamp is passed and the distribution is executed.

a very simple system in principal.

I will comment later on ‘Prices’ and how the system basically can’t be ‘incorrect’ as it is energy neutral, some people that are confused about money systems will not understand the relationship between prices and monetary issuance.


E – Attractive System implementation ‘Attractors’

The aim of the and objectives of the configuration system is to be freedom based and energy neutral.

Achieving these two goals naturally there is a need to take the human aspects from the energy token issuance, then distribute that responsibility as equally as possible to all an any human verified  participant in any system. (community)

however where to start?

E1 – Core devices and objectives (Attractors) Free Self powered Network.


As outlined we have covered the Network devices these devices where possible should be created by anyone interested in creating a community and distributed to anyone that is interested in the following :

  • A self powered device.
  • A free open unhindered access to the mesh network and possibly to all other networks. ‘Internet’

If these devices can not be simply given out once acceptable design has allowed, the instructions should be made freely available on how to create a basic self powered node to help provide access to the mesh network.

most humans will find free and open access to a free and open network on a self powered unlimited device and attraction.

So that would be considered the first ‘Attractor’

Network connection on device with unlimited power:


The image above is to place emphasis on an important aspect of the system propose.

that aspect is ‘equalization of frequency’ for more info talk to me at the contact.

However the core aspect is the possible implementation and a general equalization of frequency in an INDIVIDUALIZED manner. (as this is a freedom based system)

there will be more about this important aspect covered in other parts of this system.

Network connection on device with unlimited power.


E2 –  ideal of self sufficiency ‘capitalism’ > Core principals.


Once any community finds consensus to exist with a code system inside the free open network infrastructure, a good second core device would be a means for the citizens to both earn money tokens by selling and help the community find self sustainability.

This can be achieved with a the concept of the networked ‘Greenhouse pod’ (Organic pod)

This is a device of infrastructure that should be able to be purchased in part or whole on the market with the objective that it be implemented by most or all citizens as a means to earn more money tokens (apart from the distribution issuance and the citizen issuance.)

The ‘Organic pod’ concept description :


The concept is as follows:

A means of individualized production of food and organic material for the purpose of processing to general market food products.

key objectives:

  • A means for community members (citizens) to generate money tokens by growing their own organic material.
  • System should aim to be Modular with flexible Scalability
  • System should be connected to the Mesh network.
  • system modular parts should include the water filter system and management and other core principals.


The means to produce on a micro (or connected macro scale) individual primary goods is an advantage for any citizen (and community), the network can log and forward project an estimate price/yield.

i.e the network can tell an owner what would be best to plant at what time for the most profit.

Anyone can use any projection algorithm (as per consensus) a core should be produced and could be ‘sold’ for a small token amount.

New primary productions can be brought to market through a verified decentralized testing system. (i.e consensus)


This system does not aim to replace ‘farms’ or farming but it is an individualized means of production for any citizen.

The modular devices should be made available on the core (first community) market store, they can be purchased with money tokens that have been issued though citizenship or gained in any other manner.

The aim is to provide abundance primary production though individualized ‘capitalistic’ trends, focused on bringing innovation and new goods to market.

Some core products will achieve abundance before others, this will drive innovation as the ‘rarer’ products will yield ‘higher’ price tokens.

Excesses can be directly traded to other communities, there is no need for a ‘money token’ system for this direct ‘Intra-community’ trade to occur. but there are ways it could occur (see further discussions in document)

ideally the primary ‘Organic pod’ system should be as automated as possible, also be able to be used in urban areas, and linked for ‘farming’

Any processor or any other individual can bid for and buy any of the primary production of any other individual or group.

all ‘prices’ will be determined by the ‘open market’

There should  be no restriction on any of the modular hardware and it should be ‘open sourced’ (as per standard) for reproduction and improvement.


E3 – Essential Energy and power systems.




These devices are designed to simply provide power to any citizen on an individualize basis.

The devices are designed to provide power / energy for homes and workplaces for the means of production of various other tasks.

These various devices should be listed on any store and could be sold ‘as is’ or in a modular form to be put together DIY.

The above image is a ‘concept’ there are many ways these devices can be built, the innovative market will determine the efficiency and improvement of these systems.


E4  – DIY (Do it yourself ) Sustainable  Modular economy.

All core devices can ultimately be sold in the various communities via modular components or as a whole as the market and community decides.

The open source DIY (do it yourself) instructions would be listed on various points  in the open source mesh network, or included with the various components.


This principal can be expanded but core infrastructure  components of communities can be basically ‘Crowd sourced’ and contracted for establishment.



F- Identification of a citizen, Citizen Key  (the Mark ID)

If you are a keen observer you will notice that the issuance and redistribution system is completely energy neutral.

however you will also notice that on ‘Earth’ (this colony) there exist significant problems with ‘robots’

let me define what a ‘Robot’ is:

A ‘Robot’ is an online algorithm that can create ‘clicks’ and ‘likes’ and influence ‘Social media’ automatically, it can host ‘opinions’ and make comments.

Sometimes there might be one human behind many ‘Robot accounts’ other times the process would be completely automated, i.e completely AI (artificial intelligence)


Current estimates are that more than 60%+ of ‘internet’ traffic and ‘clicks’ and ‘opinions’ are in fact not real humans, but either algorithms or humans directed by an algorithm.

This is expanding rapidly and (in 2016) I would even argue has spread into ‘Real life’ aspects of human life.

here from Dec 2013:

‘Report: Bot traffic is up to 61.5% of all website traffic’


The problem for the system (as explained here) (in this document you are studying presently) is a follows:

The component design 100% relies on the issuance and redistribution of the energy / money tokens in an energy neutral manner.

So lets give a basic example to highlight a core issue relating to neutral issuance:

Roj joins the ‘Anything goes’ community :

He is issued his money tokens, the prerequisite to joining this community was as follows:

  1. He had to download the app.
  2. He had to answer some questions.
  3. He had to click a box in which he ‘really promised’ not to create another 100 or 200 accounts.
  4. Then he was issued his citizen credits upon approval.

And instantly he was a citizen.

Can anyone see the problem with the above process?

If you have read this document you understand that we are talking about issuance of ‘money tokens’

The credibility and constitution of any community i.e the overall success relies on the ‘energy neutral’ principal, that is to say :

  • The open source mesh network
  • The integrity of the issuance and redistribution of the money tokens.

Even in an abundant environment the above example would be abused, simply because of human type DNA containers.

i would claim based on all of my education, If the system example above was not abused, you are not currently existing on Earth and the people using the system are not humans. (as defined as humanoids type DNA containers)


F1 – Encoded Identification system that can’t be easily duplicated.

The only solution that I have been able to resolve for this problem that is both still decentralized and also individualized, is an individualized ID system that generates an encrypted ID Key, then this ID  can be used in an open source manner to cross check across multiple system (if needed)

A Breakdown of The biological ID system (mark)

  • More than one person decides to create a community.
  • They both add a set of biological one off identifiers.

Examples are :

  1. Iris Scan
  2. DNA Scan (for individual aspects)
  3. Finger Print scan.

These aspects are processed into an encoded Key, this is the ‘Citizen Key’ or the ‘Mark’ (if you want to be biblical)

This Key does not have to relate to a human in any other identifiable manner, that is to say there is really no other information  needed, there is no name, no address , no identifying numbers. this is because the ‘Citizen Key’ is primarily designed to stop the ability of multiple accounts across systems  (in a voluntary enforceable manner)

It is really a:

‘Prove you are an individual biological DNA container with a Qsoul’  process, more than a identification process, for this system to function all each community needs to know is that ‘real’ ‘humans’ or other DNA containers are using the community. because that is based on an honesty/honor system. (see later with voting)

Lets explain that with an example :

Roj has 15,000 accounts in the ‘anything goes’ community and it has since quickly collapsed into the disorganized mess it was always destined to be.

He was initially thrilled with his ‘win fall’ of money tokens however the multiple accounts by multiple people soon rendered them ‘valueless’ as no one had any incentive to either sell or buy or to do any innovate or productive engagement.

People in the ‘anything goes’ community quickly went back to just swapping goods and the community was functional in a base inefficient way.

As this breakdown of that former community was occurring, in a parallel way and inside the ‘Anything goes’ community other communities were being developed.

They started to enforce an ID system to prevent multiple accounts.

how they enforced this was as follow:

anyone that wanted to be a member of an ‘identified’ community needed to submit 3 pieces of infallible biological identifiers that can’t be easily faked or mismatched.

Such as :

  1. An IRIS Scan (an effective Qsoul ID)
  2. DNA Identifier
  3. Finger print (or other scan)

From this an encoded ‘Citizen key’ could be rendered.

This key would then be voluntarily  loaded onto the open source mesh network and any other ‘community’ could cross check it.

Cross checking is only enforced on an individual community consensus basis.

i.e any community can do as much or as little as they wish to determine and define the constitution of their community.

Roj joins this ‘MARK’ community, and processes the 3 biological Identifiers to the community which are then encoded into a ‘Citizen key’

Roj has proven he is a valid individual DNA container with a Qsoul. I.e a conscious entity.

Even cloning would not invalidate the ‘MARK’ community ID as  an IRIS scan is a part of the process.

  •  Once he joined and the ‘Citizen key’ was uploaded he could not make a duplicate account on the original community.
  • Any other community that was using the same (or similar) ID system could see that he is already a member of the ‘MARK’ community.
  • Based on this they can apply set of pre-agreed consensus rules for cross membership or take any action that the community consensus agreed on for a ‘dual citizen.’

As stated in the examples the ‘Mark’ system of ID is a great and fairly infallible solution to the problem of cross membership and multiple accounts.

it is important because without such an identifier, I know of no other way to issue money tokens in an individualized decentralized energy neutral manner.

if you do know of a way please don’t hesitate to give me feedback.

All other systems will depend on trust and ‘good will’ of individuals or groups, and in a short time, that system will be abused by natural corruption which is inherent (and a feature) in the humanoid DNA type container.

The corruption comes about in duality  with innovation / competition.

really corruption is an aspect link of creativity in humanoids.



F2 – Energy neutral issuance probability / information control link to current configuration.

When i made the statement:

I know of no other way to issue money tokens in an individualized decentralized energy neutral manner.’

I don’t just mean in reference to this system or a ‘digital’ system i’m make the statement that in a system of ‘money’ I know of no other energy neutral system.

this includes ‘Government’ or ‘private’ issuance of ‘money.

it also includes any ‘commodity’ based system such as a ‘Gold’ standard.

if you give any amount of logical study to any of those systems you will see the obvious distortions.

humans may be inclined to believe that any improvement above the current configuration is a ‘step in the right direction’  in part this is a fallacy.

I will explain:

The current configuration is built on an ‘information control principal’, that is to say information and ‘money’ issuance ‘Value’ are inextricably and meaningfully linked.

Any move away from the current configuration means a change in the information vector, so to put that in plane language:

i’m saying that the value of ‘money’ is based on how much information control there is in relation to that ‘money’

so lets bring up a vague theoretical scenario ( which is popular with some humans currently) in which ‘Government’ is issuing ‘currency’ (money) based off a gold standard, lets go the extra step and say that it’s issued ‘debt free’ so this is a ‘credit system’

What i’m saying is for this to occur in an equal and generally mathematical way control over information has shifted also.

so the same centralized sources of issuance in the current configuration can no longer have the amount of control over information as previously this is because the issuance has been moved in structure and configuration to the ‘Government’

So in that ‘move’ or ‘transition’ will be the loss of the control vector of information, the change would be net net as large as moving from a ‘Capitalist’ system to a ‘Communist’ system.

One may argue that the transition can occur, I don’t argue it can’t occur what i am stating is it can’t occur without the partial or total loss of control of information.

that is the important aspect. at the loss of control of info the ‘money’ of the current configuration essentially moves to it’s energy value at or near ‘zero’ value.

in theory (under this example) the ‘Government’ then issues new ‘money’ based on some commodity (Gold as an example) even if all ‘modern’ communication systems are lost in this transition, when the new configuration comes online, there will be no means of extraction of human energy to fund the continued control of information.

and the longer ‘modern’ communications systems are absent the more likely alternatives expand.

‘money’ is a human energy token that is valued by consensus, so any non energy neutral system needs information control  in relation to the energy neutral distortion. < this is the important info to remember.

This results in the almost total loss of control over information (which mathematically matches the old configuration near zero value of ‘token’)

So beginning from this theoretical new configuration (the Gold money config)  will only be a ‘base’ for an energy neutral system to grow from.

(a system similar to that outlined in this PDF )

even if the new config is not energy neutral and attempts to extract human energy to regain control in degrees over information that would be a very low probability.

This is because if the 3D plane information and ‘time’ move in a serialized vector in a ‘forward’ manner so once information control is lost it can not be regained in relation to those Qsoul present.

in plain language humans/other entities  can’t ‘unlearn’ information.



G – A leaderless system that balances corruption / creativity.

The energy neutral system allows corruption and monopoly to exist but also balances the field in terms of other more efficient communities.

in any issuance in any community the system could be designed by consensus to  designate a ‘King’ issuer of credit (which necessarily means the community is not an energy neutral system.

however these communities just like the ‘anything goes’ community will suffer the inefficiency of monopoly or loss of productivity through eventual lack of all incentives.

The questions quickly will arise with regard to ‘might’ v technology this will addressed with various examples in the document.

The energy neutral systems will become naturally more efficient and the mesh network of information will not let a significant advantage of ignorant violence to be gained by any one party.

i.e If a corrupted and less efficient ‘King’ centralized issuance community was rallying to violently overtake other communities for land or resources this would be fairly quickly exposed on the mesh network.

Any community outside the mesh network could be necessarily deemed hostile until proven otherwise.

I.e anyone would be correctly suspicious of totally centralized and directed information networks. (where information access is either blocked or controlled from a central source)

This could lead to localized chaotic violent events as the system is self organizing.

however that is to be expected and is as a direct result of the equalization process.



H – Definitions of community? What constitutes a community?


A community is literally any group of more than one citizen.

Many or any community can exist in any or many spaces spread over a small or large area of the planet /colony.

The first prerequisite of a community is the ability to have access to the / A decentralized mesh network.

a ‘Community’ is any group (of more than one person) that has decided to agree on a consensus code system and issuance / redistribution protocol of money tokens.


H1 – ‘Voting’ in a community with a ‘Citizen Key’

A community that has effectively designed a ID system for proof of DNA container with a Qsoul (conscious entity)  is at certain distinct advantages.

Instantly the idea of ‘voting’ becomes valuable, as it now becomes a tool for consensus.

The Citizen Key is an effective way to be able to vote on any issue in an ID’d community.

Voting can even be conducted in a completely anonymous fashion with reasonable complete confidence in the community that Citizen ID’s are counted.

Once a community is established Voting can be conducted to grant entry for new members into a community or essentially any other purpose that the community decides needs it.

Not withstanding that fact that in an Open Source environment anyone can effectively create a community.

However any community ‘Money Tokens’ will be valued on their energy attachment i.e their ‘productive capacity’ so any especially efficient and creative established  communities would be attractive for new users to join, because a vector of their ‘Productive Energy’ would be passed onto the new citizen.

This would be in the form of the citizen issuance of the Money Tokens.

So a later member of the community is being granted a ‘gift’ of actualized productive capacity, in the knowledge that their future innovation or creativity would / could expand this original capacity.

Here is a basic example :

The ‘Mark’ community has been a community for 3 years and is gaining lots of items on it’s many stores and areas across the colony.

Grover has a specific skill set that is deemed attractive to many people as is known generally on the mesh network.

The Mark community wants to hold a vote and is encouraging people to vote to approve Grover into the Mark community upon which he will be granted citizen credits and access to everything in the community.

Also the ongoing redistribution.

In turn Gover can instantly purchase any parts or items he needs to further innovate and provide to the community new items that he has the specific knowledge to make and share

(which also will generate him significant token gain in that community by selling these new items)

Anyone that appreciates Grovers new designs can also ‘gift’ him Tokens for sharing these new innovations.

I – ‘Inflation’ and new citizen socioeconomic incentives.

The questions regarding ‘inflation’ may arise upon the entry of new citizens because of the following simple economics:

In any energy neutral community  the credit issuance to every new member can simply be summed to find the total monetary tokens (the total  ‘money’ supply) in existence at any time.

so simply if there are 555 Citizens and each Citizen is issued X number of credits to find the total ‘money’ supply

555 x (X) = Total ‘money’

This is simply because issuance only occurs upon citizenship everything else is recycled existing Tokens

all the decentralized algorithm has to do is issue the same number of tokens to each new citizen for the system to essentially be energy neutral.

This necessarily means that (new citizen) (in this situation )  = ‘money supply’ expansion.

some people equate money expansion with ‘inflation’  and in some cases that is correct but it’s not as simplistic as some make out.

inflation in the classical sense is more correctly ‘more money’ existing in a system with  ‘less goods’

I would argue that system productivity that is expanded flowing forward in time by the new citizen is more than an equalizing attribute for any perceived ‘inflation’

i.e the new citizen is issued with ‘tokens’ they can instantly spend but they are also existing in the system that will be abundant and the spending velocity will cause a direct uptick in ‘business activity’ which will cause the potential ‘inflation’ to be absorbed.


I1 – How do human perceive ‘inflation’ ?

It may be the case that humans need to perceive some inflation as an incentive?

i.e they may simply not see any incentive to encourage new citizens based on the perception that they are ‘giving something for free’

not fully understanding the dynamics of the macro economic relationship of the citizen to the community.

in this case there is a number of imperfect ways to give incentive to existing citizens to expand the community.

one such way is a one off ‘new citizen’ bonus in which all existing citizens get a small one off ‘issuance’ upon the successful entry of a new citizen.

this would in effect give a small advantage to the newer citizens but nothing ongoing due to the energy neutral environment.

i.e it is a weighted ‘flaw’ but not a flaw that is big enough the effect ongoing energy neutrality.

J – Explaining decentralized robotics and algorithms – disconnected relational systems.


I want to use a series of practical ‘near future’  example to explain how decentralization works for conscious entities inside an energy neutral money issuance system.

You may or may not be familiar with the ‘Zeitgeist’ set of documentaries and later how those principals merged with the ‘Venus Project’ to formulate broad design ideas based around centralized robotic systems.

Here I intend to explain how no system needs to be centralized and no system needs to have direct relational control  over any other system.

in essence the only ‘centralized’ aspect to this configuration system you are learning about presently is the decentralized mesh network.

which is by default the sum of it’s chaotic non relational parts.

so I intend to explain how there is no need for any centralization what so ever.

centralization of systems may occur as individuals choose but there in no primary design need for it.


J1 – Joanna’s Wholesales.

J = Joanna

Joanna is a member of a reasonably large  ID’d community that is functioning, she has a love of plants, she loves all things organic.

J decided to make a living by purchasing a few organic growing centers and wholesale the produce to various outlets chains that both process the food goods and sell it directly to any other community member.

Eventually she decided buy the produce directly from individual community members and based on demand on-sell it to the processors and vendors and food outlets he profit was simply marking up the goods her other duties involve checking quality and keeping tabs on demand.

Essentially she accumulated storage space to hold various fresh and primary produce to on sell to various vendors.


J2- Decentralized algorithms ‘robots’ in the process.

In each case the is an algorithmic ‘robot’ helping in a decentralized manner.

J purchased a great algorithm that was shown to increase the efficiency of the Organic growing center by %’s she tested it and pass it on to her clients that are primary producing.

also at the vendors end they are running algorithms that track feedback and trends on the good they are selling based off the primary produce they are receiving.

this new algorithm  can make suggestions for new food designs based on the data feedback it gets and the food vendors can use or add to this data for the design of new end products.

Also in the growing system is an algorithm that is using data by networking with other systems to determine the supply and demand of various systems to give individual feedback on what to plant when for the best price for profit for the community user.

as the system is open source these algorithms may start off less refined and slowly get more more accurate by gaining more and more info, including data from vendors and other growers.


J3 – Important points on decentralized V centralized efficiency, how decentralized systems solve corruption for the most efficient result though incentive to the many.


No doubt errors will arise probably due to self interest and individuals trying to ‘rigg’ the system this way or that way.

All those things are to be expected as the open source decentralized system will be driven to further efficiency.

This is not the case with a centralized system as i will explain in the following example:


Joe can beat the system with potatoes !


Following on from the Organic growth system examples lets say Joe owns a lot of growth centers he has a veritable medium sized ‘farm’ people found that due to the cleaner system and water these centers were getting higher yield than ‘traditional’ farming methods.

Joe’s  friend works in programming so they deviously design a ‘Black hat’  way to tell the system it is growing Potato’s when it is really growing some other produce.

The idea is to try to create the perception of the oversupply of potato’s thus driving the price in the algorithm down which should tell other members that it is not profitable to plant potatoes.

With that knowledge Joe can then allocate a % of systems to potatoes and if he can game the system enough in the ‘Real world’ he will get a higher price for his potatoes by creating an artificial shortage.


But can potatoes beat decentralized systems ?


Joe and his friend are pretty smart guys, however they are working inside a decentralized system.

They carry out their ‘potato heist’ for a few growth cycles and indeed Joe notices he is picking up an above average price on his potatoes he breaks out his golden cigar pack however wait..

another programmer notices that there are significant anomalies in the system from what the quoted price on the original algorithm is saying and what the ‘Real world’ price is.

Now if this Programmer can solve this mystery everyone in the community will buy his algorithm as it and organic system program due to it being much more accurate.

he has a direct incentive to solve this problem.

He designs a new growth system program which he advertises has the the ‘X Test’ this is a modular component that can harmlessly spectro analyze the contents of the growth system, he markets it and it is instantly a hit.

Joe is unhappy he wants to keep entering false data into the system, but unfortunately there is an option on the ‘X test’ model to ignore all data from non  ‘X test’ systems.

so community members can now source from two data points they can get an estimate from the old system and and estimate from only the ‘X test’ systems, based on this new info they can proceed.

before long the individual community members do not bother running the non ‘X test’ system as it is proven to be inaccurate.

also they found by running the new system they could gain small advantages by taking advantage of the people trying to still rigg the system, they did this by working out what produce that the old system was trying game and planting that.


What is the centralized alternative to that scenario?


If that was a centralized system only a very few people would be designing (and in worse case) controlling the operating systems of the organic growth centers.

The abuse of the system would be basically unbridled as the centralized  programmers only have to make small changes to vastly profit themselves.

Also there is virtually no oversight and if there is it  would have to be based around a centralized legal procedure.

i.e it would be centrally directed oversight.

in which case those ‘enforcer’ could be potential bribed due to the accumulated wealth the designers have gained.

the next aspect is the end ‘user’ has no sure way of knowing that the system is being abused all they know is that at a point there is shortages of certain goods.

but without a decentralized system or network they have no access to know how any of the problems are occurring.

Even if a smart programmer figures it out or suspects the flaw  there is both no means or real incentive for him to act or make that public, certainly no direct financial incentive.

as the system is centralized he has no way to implement the solution, he can appeal to the ‘authority’ and hope that they listen.

it all sounds very familiar.



In the above examples I hopefully demonstrated the differences between useful decentralized algorithms, and how decentralization gives the advantage to the many though their own direct self interest.

this also displays how decentralization essentially solves problems by direct incentives to the broadest base of community which in turn drives efficiency.

none of the algorithms really directly decided anything in a relational manner they just gave information that conscious entities could utilize .

The Operation system of the growth system is decentralized designed and implemented on a market tested basis, that is to say community member A B and C set can be running one system and X Y and Z can be running a system they think does a better job.

eventually the direct incentive will drive the market to the most efficient system because this is the system that will be the most profitable for the most individual people.

all of those vectors are advantages of a decentralized system.



















Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s